This reminds me to apologise to Nerville for hi-jacking his thread

I do a carbon copy of Lauré’s procedure, except I do a 75% change (my remaining tanks are a bit overloaded).
The 75% change is due to the higher waste production as a result of the higher feeding rate (I keep track of the food dispensation and accordingly adapt the water changes).
This brings me to Tyrone’s input.
I’ve done this same exercise (and I can show the data), except I included other tests as well. The trouble with conductivity is that the dissolved elements have different contributions to the conductivity. Organic compounds contribute nearly nothing, whereas mineral salts have a much larger impact.
Fish food waste is probably mostly organic waste, with only some mineral waste.
Just think about it: All fish food must return to the water as waste. Therefore the water pollution is in direct proportion of the feed rate.
Cor